INSURANCE WON'T PAY?
Roland will check your case and get your money back.
You report damage or submit documents and days or weeks later you receive a letter that begins like this:
“Unfortunately, we cannot settle your claim…”
Many give up at this point. Understandably so – rejection letters are deliberately worded in a complicated way.
But it's important to know: A rejection is not a judgment. It's an opinion – and that is often contestable .
Here is a clear, objective assessment.
There are three main categories of rejections:
If something is missing, unclear, or implausible, then something is missing.
Examples:
"missing documents"
"not reported in time"
"no evidence of cause"
These rejections are often reversible once additional documents are submitted.
This concerns clauses, e.g.:
uninsured risk
exclusion
not an insured event
Incorrect category (e.g., buildings instead of household goods)
Often a matter of interpretation , depending on the tariff.
Then it gets more technical, e.g.:
no typical accident sequence
no permanent damage
pre-existing conditions
Participation
An external audit is almost always worthwhile in these cases.
If you read one of these, you'll know where this is headed:
❗ “Not an insured event” → Tariff issue
❗ “Exclusion according to § …” → Contract clause
❗ “Cooperation” → in case of disability/accident
❗ “Proof not provided” → Documents missing
❗ “Not reported immediately” → Deadlines
❗ “Intent” → Liability
❗ “No prospect of success” → Legal expenses insurance
Many of them are vulnerable – but only with structure.
No romance here, just a clean plan:
Important: entire text , including the back.
What was it?
Burglary
Water damage
Accident
Liability
Legal protection
Illness/Disability
Each category has different rules.
Home contents insurance? Liability insurance? Building insurance? Legal expenses insurance? Disability insurance?
Many people confuse this → it leads to false expectations.
Crazy, but true:
➡ Some appeals have deadlines.
Legal protection = often 3 months.
Disability insurance = also deadlines for subsequent notification.
Correct means: contractually sound and properly justified .
Examples:
✔ Simple theft only → not burglary
✔ Key on the table → no forced entry
✔ Planned surgery was prior to the contract → pre-existing condition
✔ Legal dispute began before the contract was signed → pre-contractual
Then there is little room for maneuver – but there are exceptions .
This is where the "exciting" part begins.
Rejections are often wrong when:
✔ Wrong type of insurance was chosen
✔ Incorrect statements about terms and conditions are included
✔ Deadlines were applied incorrectly
✔ Diagnoses were interpreted differently
✔ Burglary was classified as "simple theft"
✔ Evidence is actually sufficient
✔ Opposing party was poorly identified
✔ Medical reports are missing
✔ Damage amount was incorrectly estimated
We see this all the time.
Three mistakes cost people thousands of euros every year:
Insurance companies factor this into their calculations.
“That’s outrageous!” achieves exactly 0.
Then deadlines expire and it's over.
You can send this sentence respectfully and objectively :
"Please provide me with the specific clause, including the relevant section, from the insurance terms and conditions on which the rejection is based, as well as the exact date of the accepted claim.
Furthermore, please inform me which documents are still required for the review."
This text triggers two things:
The insurance company must define the case.
The insurance company must provide a more detailed explanation.
Many rejections fall apart at this point.
To be honest: not always.
But it's especially worthwhile in the following cases:
✔ Burglary vs. Theft
✔ Water Damage vs. Tap Water
✔ Employment Law (Legal Expenses Insurance)
✔ Pre-existing Conditions (Disability/Accident)
✔ Liability with Allegation of Intentional Malpractice
✔ Contributory Negligence (Disability/Accident)
✔ Medical Disputes
This is not about "paper," but about interpretation and expert opinions .
A rejection does not mean:
❌ "You won't get any money"
❌ "The insurance company is right"
❌ "Case closed"
But mostly:
➡ “We’ll try it without payment first.”
There are reasons for it, but also ways to counteract it.
If you are unsure about the accuracy:
Rejection photographing
Briefly explain what happened
Include the policy/contract number
Upload here: 015771621006
We'll tell you:
✔ Is it correct
? ✔ Is an appeal worthwhile?
✔ What additional information can you provide?
✔ What deadlines apply
? ✔ How can you argue your case?
No legal drama. No insurance jargon.
Roland will check your case and get your money back.